SEER2 Explained: What Changed in 2023 and Why It Matters

New efficiency testing standards make SEER2 ratings 4-5% lower than old SEER ratings—but equipment is actually more efficient. Understand the changes and calculate real payback periods.

What is SEER2?

SEER2 (Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio 2) is the updated efficiency metric for air conditioners and heat pumps, replacing SEER starting January 1, 2023. It measures how many BTUs of cooling a system delivers per watt-hour of electricity over a typical cooling season.

Higher SEER2 = lower energy bills. A 16 SEER2 system uses ~15% less electricity than a 14 SEER2 system to deliver the same cooling.

Before buying, calculate your cooling load with our BTU calculator—no point paying for high efficiency if your system is oversized and short-cycling.

⚡ SEER vs SEER2 Comparison

Old SEER (pre-2023) New SEER2 (2023+) 13-14 SEER → 13.4 SEER2 (minimum legal) 15-16 SEER → 14.3-15.2 SEER2 (most common) 18-20 SEER → 17-19 SEER2 (premium) 21+ SEER → 20+ SEER2 (ultra high-eff) 📉 SEER2 ratings are ~4-5% lower than SEER, but equipment isn't less efficient— the testing method changed to reflect real-world performance more accurately.

What Changed from SEER to SEER2?

1. M1 Test Standard Replaced M Testing

The old SEER test (AHRI 210/240) used unrealistic assumptions:

The new SEER2 test (AHRI 210/240-2023) includes:

Result: SEER2 ratings are 4-5% lower than SEER ratings for the same equipment. A 16 SEER system becomes ~15.2 SEER2, but the actual unit didn't change—the test did.

2. Minimum Efficiency Standards Increased

DOE (Department of Energy) raised minimum efficiency requirements in 2023:

Old Minimums (pre-2023):

New Minimums (2023+):

EER2 (Energy Efficiency Ratio 2) is a new metric measuring efficiency at peak load (95°F outdoor temp). This prevents "gaming" where manufacturers optimize only for average temps (SEER2) but perform poorly at peak heat.

3. Regional Standards (North vs South)

The US is divided into two regions for efficiency standards:

Check your climate zone to see which standards apply.

SEER2 Ratings Explained

13.4-14.3 SEER2 (Budget/Minimum)

Who it's for: Rentals, flip properties, homes you'll sell within 5 years

Cost: $3,500-5,500 installed (2-2.5 ton system)

Energy use: ~$900-1,200/year cooling costs (Zone 3, 2,000 sq ft home)

Pros: Lowest upfront cost, legal minimum

Cons: Highest operating costs, single-stage (poor comfort/humidity control)

15-16 SEER2 (Standard/Best Value)

Who it's for: Most homeowners staying 7+ years

Cost: $4,500-6,500 installed (2-2.5 ton system)

Energy use: ~$750-1,000/year cooling costs (15-20% savings vs minimum)

Pros: Best cost-to-savings ratio, often includes two-stage or variable-speed, 8-12 year payback

Cons: $1,000-1,500 more upfront than budget tier

This is the "sweet spot" for most climates. Calculate your payback using savings from 14 SEER2 to 16 SEER2.

17-19 SEER2 (High-Efficiency)

Who it's for: Hot climates (Zones 1-2), high electricity costs (>$0.15/kWh), energy-conscious buyers

Cost: $6,000-8,500 installed (2-2.5 ton system)

Energy use: ~$650-850/year cooling costs (25-30% savings vs minimum)

Pros: Very efficient, usually variable-speed (excellent humidity control), quieter operation

Cons: $2,000-3,500 more upfront, 12-18 year payback in moderate climates

Makes sense in Phoenix, Miami, Houston where AC runs 6-9 months/year. Marginal value in Boston, Seattle where AC runs 2-4 months/year.

20+ SEER2 (Ultra-Premium)

Who it's for: Net-zero homes, LEED projects, ultra-low energy bills

Cost: $8,500-12,000+ installed

Energy use: ~$550-750/year cooling costs (35-40% savings vs minimum)

Pros: Lowest operating costs, best comfort (inverter-driven compressors)

Cons: 15-25 year payback, expensive repairs (proprietary components)

Only makes financial sense if electricity costs >$0.20/kWh or you prioritize environmental impact over ROI.

Payback Period Calculation

Example: 2-Ton System, Zone 3, $0.13/kWh Electricity

Scenario A: 14.3 SEER2 (Minimum)

Scenario B: 16 SEER2 (Standard)

Wait, that's terrible ROI! What went wrong? The home is undersized for the example. Let's recalculate for proper cooling hours.

Realistic Scenario: Zone 2 (Hot), 1,800 Hours/Year Cooling

Scenario A: 14.3 SEER2

Scenario B: 16 SEER2

Still long payback, but includes comfort benefits (two-stage operation) that budget unit doesn't offer. See humidity control guide for non-financial benefits.

Scenario C: 18 SEER2 (High-Efficiency)

Ultra-efficiency rarely pencils out on energy savings alone. Buy for comfort/quietness/environmental reasons, not ROI.

When High SEER2 Makes Sense

Factor 1: Climate Zone

The hotter your climate, the faster high-efficiency pays back:

Check your zone: Climate Zone Guide

Factor 2: Electricity Costs

Higher rates shorten payback:

Factor 3: Home Ownership Timeline

Factor 4: Comfort Priorities

High-SEER2 systems typically include variable-speed compressors and blowers, delivering:

If these matter more than ROI, buy high-efficiency regardless of payback period.

SEER2 vs EER2: What's the Difference?

SEER2 (Seasonal Efficiency)

EER2 (Peak Load Efficiency)

Example: Unit A is 18 SEER2 / 12.5 EER2. Unit B is 16 SEER2 / 13.0 EER2. In Phoenix (lots of 100°F+ days), Unit B performs better when you need it most despite lower seasonal rating.

For hot climates, check EER2 rating alongside SEER2 when comparing equipment.

How to Compare SEER2 Equipment

Step 1: Size Correctly First

Use BTU calculator to determine proper capacity. An oversized 18 SEER2 system performs worse than a properly sized 14 SEER2 system (short-cycling wastes efficiency).

Step 2: Get Multiple Bids

Request quotes at 14, 16, and 18 SEER2 from 3 contractors. Compare equipment brands, warranties, and installation scope—not just SEER2 rating. See bid comparison guide.

Step 3: Calculate Your Payback

Use this formula:

Payback Years = (Higher SEER2 Cost - Lower SEER2 Cost) ÷ Annual Savings

Annual Savings = (BTU × Cooling Hours ÷ 1000) × (1/Lower SEER2 - 1/Higher SEER2) × Electricity Rate

Example with 24,000 BTU load, 1,500 hours/year, $0.14/kWh:

If payback exceeds 15 years, stick with lower SEER2 unless you prioritize comfort features.

Step 4: Consider Variable-Speed Benefits

16+ SEER2 systems usually include variable-speed compressors, which provide non-energy benefits:

These are worth $500-1,000 to most homeowners even if energy payback is long.

Common SEER2 Misconceptions

❌ Myths About SEER2

  • Myth: "SEER2 is lower because equipment got worse."
    Reality: Testing method changed to reflect real-world performance; equipment is equally efficient.
  • Myth: "Always buy highest SEER2 for maximum savings."
    Reality: ROI diminishes above 16-17 SEER2 in most climates; payback can exceed equipment lifespan.
  • Myth: "16 SEER2 uses half the energy of 8 SEER2."
    Reality: 16 SEER2 uses 50% of 8 SEER2's energy (inverse relationship), but you can't buy 8 SEER2 legally anymore.
  • Myth: "SEER2 rating guarantees those savings."
    Reality: Only if sized correctly and installed properly. Poor duct sealing, oversizing, or low airflow kills efficiency.

Next Steps

  1. Calculate load: BTU Calculator to determine proper tonnage
  2. Determine cooling hours: Estimate based on climate zone (1,000-2,500 hrs/year typical)
  3. Calculate payback: Use formula above for 14, 16, 18 SEER2 options
  4. Get bids: Request quotes at multiple efficiency levels, compare total value (comparison guide)
  5. Prioritize sizing over SEER2: A perfectly sized 14 SEER2 beats an oversized 18 SEER2

Size Your System First, Then Choose SEER2

Proper capacity matters more than efficiency rating

Calculate Your BTU Requirements

Related Articles